lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240425122151.1d5efcc2@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 12:21:51 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: dev@...nvswitch.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] selftests: openvswitch: Questions about possible
 enhancements

On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:57:19 +0100 Simon Horman wrote:
> openvswitch.sh does not appear to have any dependencies on Open vSwitch
> user-space. My understanding is that, rather, it makes use of
> tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py to talk to the Kernel
> using Netlink (which is also what Open vSwitch user-space does).
> 
> My brief testing indicates that for this the only dependencies
> when running on Amazon Linux 2 are python3 and pyroute2.
> 
> I think that it should be possible to port pmtu.sh to use ovs-dpctl.py.
> This would require some enhancements to ovs-dpctl.py to handle adding the
> tunnel vports (interfaces).
> 
> As an aside, to run the Open vSwitch tests in pmtu.sh the openvswitch
> kernel module is needed. So I think it would make sense to add
> CONFIG_OPENVSWITCH to tools/testing/selftests/net/config.
> 
> That would mean that tools/testing/selftests/net/config also has all
> the requirements to run openvswitch.sh. If so, we probably wouldn't need to
> add tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/config or otherwise do anything
> special to configure the kernel for openvswitch.sh.

That sounds great, for simplicity we could move the ovs files down 
to the .../net/ directory. It'd be cool to not have to do that, and
let us separate tests more clearly into directories. But right now
every directory has its own runner so there's a high price to pay
for a primarily aesthetic gain :(

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ