| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 11:28:43 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
Donald Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
Eric Chanudet <echanude@...hat.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 05/16] module: make module_memory_{alloc,free} more self-contained
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@...nel.org>
Move the logic related to the memory allocation and freeing into
module_memory_alloc() and module_memory_free().
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@...nel.org>
---
kernel/module/main.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c
index e1e8a7a9d6c1..5b82b069e0d3 100644
--- a/kernel/module/main.c
+++ b/kernel/module/main.c
@@ -1203,15 +1203,44 @@ static bool mod_mem_use_vmalloc(enum mod_mem_type type)
mod_mem_type_is_core_data(type);
}
-static void *module_memory_alloc(unsigned int size, enum mod_mem_type type)
+static int module_memory_alloc(struct module *mod, enum mod_mem_type type)
{
+ unsigned int size = PAGE_ALIGN(mod->mem[type].size);
+ void *ptr;
+
+ mod->mem[type].size = size;
+
if (mod_mem_use_vmalloc(type))
- return vzalloc(size);
- return module_alloc(size);
+ ptr = vmalloc(size);
+ else
+ ptr = module_alloc(size);
+
+ if (!ptr)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ /*
+ * The pointer to these blocks of memory are stored on the module
+ * structure and we keep that around so long as the module is
+ * around. We only free that memory when we unload the module.
+ * Just mark them as not being a leak then. The .init* ELF
+ * sections *do* get freed after boot so we *could* treat them
+ * slightly differently with kmemleak_ignore() and only grey
+ * them out as they work as typical memory allocations which
+ * *do* eventually get freed, but let's just keep things simple
+ * and avoid *any* false positives.
+ */
+ kmemleak_not_leak(ptr);
+
+ memset(ptr, 0, size);
+ mod->mem[type].base = ptr;
+
+ return 0;
}
-static void module_memory_free(void *ptr, enum mod_mem_type type)
+static void module_memory_free(struct module *mod, enum mod_mem_type type)
{
+ void *ptr = mod->mem[type].base;
+
if (mod_mem_use_vmalloc(type))
vfree(ptr);
else
@@ -1229,12 +1258,12 @@ static void free_mod_mem(struct module *mod)
/* Free lock-classes; relies on the preceding sync_rcu(). */
lockdep_free_key_range(mod_mem->base, mod_mem->size);
if (mod_mem->size)
- module_memory_free(mod_mem->base, type);
+ module_memory_free(mod, type);
}
/* MOD_DATA hosts mod, so free it at last */
lockdep_free_key_range(mod->mem[MOD_DATA].base, mod->mem[MOD_DATA].size);
- module_memory_free(mod->mem[MOD_DATA].base, MOD_DATA);
+ module_memory_free(mod, MOD_DATA);
}
/* Free a module, remove from lists, etc. */
@@ -2225,7 +2254,6 @@ static int find_module_sections(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
static int move_module(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
{
int i;
- void *ptr;
enum mod_mem_type t = 0;
int ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -2234,26 +2262,12 @@ static int move_module(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
mod->mem[type].base = NULL;
continue;
}
- mod->mem[type].size = PAGE_ALIGN(mod->mem[type].size);
- ptr = module_memory_alloc(mod->mem[type].size, type);
- /*
- * The pointer to these blocks of memory are stored on the module
- * structure and we keep that around so long as the module is
- * around. We only free that memory when we unload the module.
- * Just mark them as not being a leak then. The .init* ELF
- * sections *do* get freed after boot so we *could* treat them
- * slightly differently with kmemleak_ignore() and only grey
- * them out as they work as typical memory allocations which
- * *do* eventually get freed, but let's just keep things simple
- * and avoid *any* false positives.
- */
- kmemleak_not_leak(ptr);
- if (!ptr) {
+
+ ret = module_memory_alloc(mod, type);
+ if (ret) {
t = type;
goto out_enomem;
}
- memset(ptr, 0, mod->mem[type].size);
- mod->mem[type].base = ptr;
}
/* Transfer each section which specifies SHF_ALLOC */
@@ -2296,7 +2310,7 @@ static int move_module(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
return 0;
out_enomem:
for (t--; t >= 0; t--)
- module_memory_free(mod->mem[t].base, t);
+ module_memory_free(mod, t);
return ret;
}
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists