[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5b8b52cf-bd43-40c0-962a-c6936637b7de@denx.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:40:21 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Christophe Roullier <christophe.roullier@...s.st.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, Jose Abreu
<joabreu@...opsys.com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] net: stmmac: dwmac-stm32: clean the way to
manage wol irqwake
On 4/26/24 2:57 PM, Christophe Roullier wrote:
> On STM32 platforms it is no longer needed to use a dedicated wakeup to
> wake up system from CStop.
This really needs more clarification.
Why was the code needed before ? Maybe because it was used by some of
the older STM32F4/F7/H7 SoCs ? Is it still needed by those SoCs ? Will
this patch break those older SoCs ?
> This patch removes the dedicated wake up usage
> and clean the way to register the wake up irq.
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists