netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 11/12] microchip: lan865x: add driver support for Microchip's LAN865X MAC-PHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zi1pj28Eb57bByef@builder>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 23:09:35 +0200
From: Ramón Nordin Rodriguez <ramon.nordin.rodriguez@...roamp.se>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Parthiban Veerasooran <Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com>,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org, saeedm@...dia.com,
	anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, corbet@....net,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com,
	ruanjinjie@...wei.com, steen.hegelund@...rochip.com,
	vladimir.oltean@....com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
	Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com, Pier.Beruto@...emi.com,
	Selvamani.Rajagopal@...emi.com, Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com,
	benjamin.bigler@...nformulastudent.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 11/12] microchip: lan865x: add driver support
 for Microchip's LAN865X MAC-PHY

> I think the error pretty much is what it says it is, the driver doesn't
> appear to have a spi_device_id table containing lan8650. The name of
> the driver is lan685x which is used in the fallback clause in
> __spi_register_driver(), so it complains as it does not find lan8650 in
> either. If my understanding is correct, either a spi_device_id table is
> required or the driver needs a rename with s/x/0/.
> 

Right you are, no gdb necessary. With the caveat that I only get it
working when setting DRV_NAME to "lan8651", setting it to "lan8650"
still produces the log

R