lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874654d4-3c52-4b0e-944a-dc5822f54a5d@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 16:59:40 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ramón Nordin Rodriguez <ramon.nordin.rodriguez@...roamp.se>
Cc: Parthiban Veerasooran <Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com>,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org, saeedm@...dia.com,
	anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com,
	ruanjinjie@...wei.com, steen.hegelund@...rochip.com,
	vladimir.oltean@....com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
	Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com, Pier.Beruto@...emi.com,
	Selvamani.Rajagopal@...emi.com, Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com,
	benjamin.bigler@...nformulastudent.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 05/12] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: implement error
 interrupts unmasking

> n  |  name     |  min  |  avg  |  max  |  rx dropped  |  samples
> 1  |  no mod   |  827K |  846K |  891K |      945     |     5
> 2  |  no log   |  711K |  726K |  744K |      562     |     5
> 3  |  less irq |  815K |  833K |  846K |      N/A     |     5
> 4  |  no irq   |  914K |  924K |  931K |      N/A     |     5
> 5  |  simple   |  857K |  868K |  879K |      615     |     5

That is odd.

Side question: What CONFIG_HZ= do you have? 100, 250, 1000?  Try
1000. I've seen problems where the driver wants to sleep for a short
time, but the CONFIG_HZ value limits how short a time it can actually
sleep. It ends up sleeping much longer than it wants.

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ