netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: broadcom-bluetooth: Add CYW43439 DT binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 20:22:51 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
 Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: broadcom-bluetooth: Add CYW43439 DT
 binding

On 29/04/2024 17:10, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 3/19/24 6:41 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 19/03/2024 05:20, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> CYW43439 is a Wi-Fi + Bluetooth combo device from Infineon.
>>> The Bluetooth part is capable of Bluetooth 5.2 BR/EDR/LE .
>>> This chip is present e.g. on muRata 1YN module.
>>>
>>> Extend the binding with its DT compatible using fallback
>>> compatible string to "brcm,bcm4329-bt" which seems to be
>>> the oldest compatible device. This should also prevent the
>>> growth of compatible string tables in drivers. The existing
>>> block of compatible strings is retained.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
>>
>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> 
> Is there any action necessary from me to get this applied ?

I recommend resending with proper PATCH prefix matching net-next
expectations.

Best regards,
Krzysztof