netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: broadcom-bluetooth: Add CYW43439 DT binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:57:33 -0400
From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, 
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, 
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: broadcom-bluetooth: Add CYW43439 DT binding

Hi Marek,

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 4:44 PM Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de> wrote:
>
> On 4/29/24 8:22 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 29/04/2024 17:10, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 3/19/24 6:41 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> On 19/03/2024 05:20, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>> CYW43439 is a Wi-Fi + Bluetooth combo device from Infineon.
> >>>> The Bluetooth part is capable of Bluetooth 5.2 BR/EDR/LE .
> >>>> This chip is present e.g. on muRata 1YN module.
> >>>>
> >>>> Extend the binding with its DT compatible using fallback
> >>>> compatible string to "brcm,bcm4329-bt" which seems to be
> >>>> the oldest compatible device. This should also prevent the
> >>>> growth of compatible string tables in drivers. The existing
> >>>> block of compatible strings is retained.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> >>
> >> Is there any action necessary from me to get this applied ?
> >
> > I recommend resending with proper PATCH prefix matching net-next
> > expectations.
>
> I don't think bluetooth is net-next , it has its own ML and its own
> 'Bluetooth:' subject prefix. Its patchwork.k.o project also doesn't seem
> to contain many patches with 'net'/'net-next' prefix. Also DT bindings
> do not seem to use it per 'git log
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/'. But the bot is
> complaining about the prefix. Hence my confusion.

Well usually we require Bluetooth: prefix to indicate this patch is
for bluetooth/bluetooth-next trees, or you can do via subject e.g.
[bluetooth-next v1...] otherwise it could be merged via other trees.

-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz