netdev - Re: pull-request: bpf-next 2024-04-29

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:16:33 +0200
From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, 
	edumazet@...gle.com, ast@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull-request: bpf-next 2024-04-29

On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 22:22, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:16:57 +0200 Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> >       tools: Add ethtool.h header to tooling infra
>
> Could you follow up to remove this header?
> Having to keep multiple headers in sync is annoying, and using
> 'make headers' or including in-tree headers directly is not rocket
> science.

Just because I am curious, what was the reason/history behind the
tools/include directory to start with? Most headers seem to be copies
there.

Thanks: Magnus