lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240501072835.631dcda0@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 07:28:35 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Cc: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com>, "davem@...emloft.net"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, "ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org"
 <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "jacob.e.keller@...el.com"
 <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jianbo
 Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net: Fix one page_pool page leak from
 skb_frag_unref

On Wed, 1 May 2024 07:24:34 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> I vote #2, actually :( Or #3 make page pool ref safe to acquire
> concurrently, but that plus fixing all the places where we do crazy
> things may be tricky.
> 
> Even taking the ref is not as simple as using atomic_long_inc_not_zero()
> sadly, partly because we try to keep the refcount at one, in an apparent
> attempt to avoid dirtying the cache line twice.
> 
> So maybe partial revert to stop be bleeding and retry after more testing
> is the way to go?
> 
> I had a quick look at the code and there is also a bunch of functions
> which "shift" frags from one skb to another, without checking whether
> the pp_recycle state matches.

BTW these two refs seem to look at the wrong skb:

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 0c8b82750000..afd3336928d0 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -2148,7 +2148,7 @@ struct sk_buff *__pskb_copy_fclone(struct sk_buff *skb, int headroom,
 		}
 		for (i = 0; i < skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags; i++) {
 			skb_shinfo(n)->frags[i] = skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i];
-			skb_frag_ref(skb, i);
+			skb_frag_ref(n, i);
 		}
 		skb_shinfo(n)->nr_frags = i;
 	}
@@ -5934,7 +5934,7 @@ bool skb_try_coalesce(struct sk_buff *to, struct sk_buff *from,
 	 * since we set nr_frags to 0.
 	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < from_shinfo->nr_frags; i++)
-		__skb_frag_ref(&from_shinfo->frags[i], from->pp_recycle);
+		__skb_frag_ref(&from_shinfo->frags[i], to->pp_recycle);
 
 	to->truesize += delta;
 	to->len += len;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ