[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240430191042.05aad656@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 19:10:42 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Ronald Wahl <ronald.wahl@...itan.com>, "David S.
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [net,PATCH v2] net: ks8851: Queue RX packets in IRQ handler
instead of disabling BHs
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 21:43:34 +0200 Marek Vasut wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ks8851.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ks8851.h
> index 31f75b4a67fd7..f311074ea13bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ks8851.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ks8851.h
> @@ -399,6 +399,7 @@ struct ks8851_net {
>
> struct work_struct rxctrl_work;
>
> + struct sk_buff_head rxq;
> struct sk_buff_head txq;
> unsigned int queued_len;
One more round, sorry, this structure has a kdoc, please fill in
the description for the new member.
> @@ -408,7 +406,8 @@ static irqreturn_t ks8851_irq(int irq, void *_ks)
> if (status & IRQ_LCI)
> mii_check_link(&ks->mii);
>
> - local_bh_enable();
> + while (!skb_queue_empty(&ks->rxq))
> + netif_rx(__skb_dequeue(&ks->rxq));
Personal preference and probably not worth retesting but FWIW I'd write
this as:
while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&ks->rxq)))
netif_rx(skb);
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists