netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] mfd: intel_quark_i2c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240502101145.GT5338@google.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 11:11:45 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>, Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>,
	Mengyuan Lou <mengyuanlou@...-swift.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Duanqiang Wen <duanqiangwen@...-swift.com>,
	"open list:SYNOPSYS DESIGNWARE I2C DRIVER" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:WANGXUN ETHERNET DRIVER" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Utilize
 i2c-designware.h

On Thu, 02 May 2024, Jarkko Nikula wrote:

> On 4/30/24 12:36 PM, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Hi Andy,
> > 
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 05:30:24PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 02:44:37PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > > > Rather than open code the i2c_designware string, utilize the newly
> > > > defined constant in i2c-designware.h.
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > P.S>
> > > Note, my tags for MFD patches does not imply that I agree on the general idea
> > > of this series, it's just in case if it will be approved by the respective
> > > maintainers (I²C / MFD / etc).
> > 
> > I waited a bit to see if more comments were coming.
> > 
> Well I had doubts about the idea will it help maintaining code or do the
> opposite but didn't receive a reply from the patch author:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/62e58960-f568-459d-8690-0c9c608a4d9f@linux.intel.com/
> 
> Also Lee Jones have similar concerns:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20240502071751.GA5338@google.com/

Right.  It's a NACK from me, sorry.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]