[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4m3x4rtztwxctwlq2pdorgbv2hblylnuc2haz7ni4ti52n57xi@utxkr5ripqp2>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 12:44:39 -0700
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, tj@...nel.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
lizefan.x@...edance.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, yosryahmed@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel-team@...udflare.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] cgroup/rstat: add cgroup_rstat_cpu_lock helpers and
tracepoints
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 07:22:26PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
[...]
>
> More data, the histogram of time spend under the lock have some strange
> variation issues with a group in 4ms to 65ms area. Investigating what
> can be causeing this... which next step depend in these tracepoints.
>
> @lock_cnt: 759146
>
> @locked_ns:
> [1K, 2K) 499 | |
> [2K, 4K) 206928
> |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@|
> [4K, 8K) 147904 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ |
> [8K, 16K) 64453 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ |
> [16K, 32K) 135467 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ |
> [32K, 64K) 75943 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ |
> [64K, 128K) 38359 |@@@@@@@@@ |
> [128K, 256K) 46597 |@@@@@@@@@@@ |
> [256K, 512K) 32466 |@@@@@@@@ |
> [512K, 1M) 3945 | |
> [1M, 2M) 642 | |
> [2M, 4M) 750 | |
> [4M, 8M) 1932 | |
> [8M, 16M) 2114 | |
> [16M, 32M) 1039 | |
> [32M, 64M) 108 | |
>
Am I understanding correctly that 1K is 1 microsecond and 1M is 1
millisecond? Is it possible to further divide this table into update
side and flush side?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists