netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v5 2/2] net: Add additional bit to support clockid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0f88ec53-6c92-434d-81c8-538b31a2385e@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 14:33:26 -0700
From: "Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)" <quic_abchauha@...cinc.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
        "Willem
 de Bruijn" <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau
	<martin.lau@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, bpf
	<bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        <kernel@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v5 2/2] net: Add additional bit to support
 clockid_t timestamp type


> BPF_CALL_3(bpf_skb_set_tstamp, struct sk_buff *, skb,
>            u64, tstamp, u32, tstamp_type)
> {
>     /* ... */
>     case BPF_SKB_CLOCK_TAI:
>         if (!tstamp)
>             return -EINVAL;
>         skb->tstamp = tstamp;
>         skb->tstamp_type = SKB_CLOCK_TAI;
>         break;
>         case BPF_SKB_CLOCK_REALTIME:
>         skb->tstamp = tstamp;
>         skb->tstamp_type = SKB_CLOCK_REALTIME;
>         break;
> 
>     /* ... */
> }
> 
>>               return -EINVAL;
> 
>> @@ -9388,17 +9394,17 @@ static struct bpf_insn *bpf_convert_tstamp_type_read(const struct bpf_insn *si,
>>   {
>>       __u8 value_reg = si->dst_reg;
>>       __u8 skb_reg = si->src_reg;
>> -    /* AX is needed because src_reg and dst_reg could be the same */
>> -    __u8 tmp_reg = BPF_REG_AX;
>> -
>> -    *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, tmp_reg, skb_reg,
>> -                  SKB_BF_MONO_TC_OFFSET);
>> -    *insn++ = BPF_JMP32_IMM(BPF_JSET, tmp_reg,
>> -                SKB_MONO_DELIVERY_TIME_MASK, 2);
>> -    *insn++ = BPF_MOV32_IMM(value_reg, BPF_SKB_TSTAMP_UNSPEC);
>> -    *insn++ = BPF_JMP_A(1);
>> -    *insn++ = BPF_MOV32_IMM(value_reg, BPF_SKB_TSTAMP_DELIVERY_MONO);
>> -
>> +    BUILD_BUG_ON(__SKB_CLOCK_MAX != BPF_SKB_TSTAMP_DELIVERY_TAI);
> 
> Add these also:
> 
>     BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_CLOCK_REALTIME != BPF_SKB_CLOCK_REALTIME);
>     BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_CLOCK_MONOTONIC != BPF_SKB_CLOCK_MONOTONIC);
>     BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_CLOCK_TAI != BPF_SKB_CLOCK_TAI);
> 

Martin, The above suggestion of adding BUILD_BUG_ON always gives me a warning stating the following. 

Some systems considers warning as error if compiler flags are enabled. I believe this requires your suggestion before i raise RFC v6 patchset to either keep the 
BUILD_BUG_ON or remove it completely. 

/local/mnt/workspace/kernel_master/linux-next/net/core/filter.c:9395:34: warning: comparison between ‘enum skb_tstamp_type’ and ‘enum <anonymous>’ [-Wenum-compare]
 9395 |  BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_CLOCK_REALTIME != BPF_SKB_CLOCK_REALTIME);
      |                                  ^~
/local/mnt/workspace/kernel_master/linux-next/include/linux/compiler_types.h:451:9: note: in definition of macro ‘__compiletime_assert’
  451 |   if (!(condition))     \
      |         ^~~~~~~~~
/local/mnt/workspace/kernel_master/linux-next/include/linux/compiler_types.h:471:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘_compiletime_assert’
  471 |  _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
      |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/local/mnt/workspace/kernel_master/linux-next/include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro ‘compiletime_assert’
   39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
      |                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/local/mnt/workspace/kernel_master/linux-next/include/linux/build_bug.h:50:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG’
   50 |  BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
      |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/local/mnt/workspace/kernel_master/linux-next/net/core/filter.c:9395:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG_ON’
 9395 |  BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_CLOCK_REALTIME != BPF_SKB_CLOCK_REALTIME);
      |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~
/local/mnt/workspace/kernel_master/linux-next/net/core/filter.c:9396:35: warning: comparison between ‘enum skb_tstamp_type’ and ‘enum <anonymous>’ [-Wenum-compare]
 9396 |  BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_CLOCK_MONOTONIC != BPF_SKB_CLOCK_MONOTONIC);
      |                                   ^~
/local/mnt/workspace/kernel_master/linux-next/include/linux/compiler_types.h:451:9: note: in definition of macro ‘__compiletime_assert’
  451 |   if (!(condition))     \
      |         ^~~~~~~~~

         |                                      ^~