[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240506115043.GA28172@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 13:50:43 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@...el.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 6/7] page_pool: check for DMA sync shortcut
earlier
The first hunk here fails when trying to apply it to the 6.9-rc6
based dma-mapping for-next tree.
Should I go ahead and just apply the first three patches? Or do
we need a shared branch with something?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists