[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9cf35451-9d03-e487-c06b-580208ac3a3d@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 20:11:30 +0300 (EEST)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Christoph Fritz <christoph.fritz@...dev.de>
cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andreas Lauser <andreas.lauser@...cedes-benz.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Pavel Pisa <pisa@....felk.cvut.cz>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] can: lin: Handle rx offload config frames
On Thu, 2 May 2024, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> The CAN Broadcast Manager now has the capability to dispatch CANFD
> frames marked with the id LINBUS_RXOFFLOAD_ID. This patch introduces
> functionality to interpret these specific frames, enabling the
> configuration of RX offloading within the LIN driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Fritz <christoph.fritz@...dev.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/can/lin.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/lin.c b/drivers/net/can/lin.c
> index 95906003666fb..ee2ebea2c865f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/lin.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/lin.c
> @@ -194,6 +194,27 @@ static void lin_remove_sysfs_id_files(struct net_device *ndev)
> }
> }
>
> +static int lin_setup_rxoffload(struct lin_device *ldev,
> + struct canfd_frame *cfd)
> +{
> + struct lin_responder_answer answ;
> +
> + if (!(cfd->flags & CANFD_FDF))
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
This seems a bit odd error code.
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct lin_responder_answer) > sizeof(cfd->data));
> + memcpy(&answ, cfd->data, sizeof(struct lin_responder_answer));
2x sizeof(answ)
> +
> + answ.lf.checksum_mode = (cfd->can_id & LIN_ENHANCED_CKSUM_FLAG) ?
> + LINBUS_ENHANCED : LINBUS_CLASSIC;
> +
> + if (answ.lf.lin_id > LIN_ID_MASK ||
> + answ.event_associated_id > LIN_ID_MASK)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return ldev->ldev_ops->update_responder_answer(ldev, &answ);
> +}
> +
> static void lin_tx_work_handler(struct work_struct *ws)
> {
> struct lin_device *ldev = container_of(ws, struct lin_device,
> @@ -206,6 +227,14 @@ static void lin_tx_work_handler(struct work_struct *ws)
> ldev->tx_busy = true;
>
> cfd = (struct canfd_frame *)ldev->tx_skb->data;
> +
> + if (cfd->can_id & LIN_RXOFFLOAD_DATA_FLAG) {
> + ret = lin_setup_rxoffload(ldev, cfd);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + netdev_err(ndev, "setting up rx failed %d\n", ret);
> + goto lin_tx_out;
> + }
> +
> lf.checksum_mode = (cfd->can_id & LIN_ENHANCED_CKSUM_FLAG) ?
> LINBUS_ENHANCED : LINBUS_CLASSIC;
> lf.lin_id = cfd->can_id & LIN_ID_MASK;
>
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists