[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25798e60-d1cc-40ce-b081-80afdb182dd6@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 21:14:01 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Kamil Horák - 2N <kamilh@...s.com>
Cc: florian.fainelli@...adcom.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
hkallweit1@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] net: phy: bcm54811: New link mode for BroadR-Reach
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 04:40:13PM +0200, Kamil Horák - 2N wrote:
> Introduce new link modes necessary for the BroadR-Reach mode on
> bcm5481x PHY by Broadcom and new PHY tunable to choose between
> normal (IEEE) ethernet and BroadR-Reach modes of the PHY.
I would of split this into two patches. The reason being, we need the
new link mode. But do we need the tunable? Why don't i just use the
link mode to select it?
ethtool -s eth42 advertise 1BR10
Once you have split this up, you can explain the link mode patch in a
bit more detail. That because the name does not fit 802.3, the normal
macros cannot be used, so everything needs to be hand crafted.
Andrew
---
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists