[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQMr9tinpb=Fsgx6B0JKP0L0VYusdPha_RnMH6EWVpztg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 17:12:50 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>
Cc: casey@...aufler-ca.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, xmu@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] netlabel: fix RCU annotation for IPv4 options on
socket creation
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 6:45 AM Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Xiumei reports the following splat when netlabel and TCP socket are used:
>
> =============================
> WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> 6.9.0-rc2+ #637 Not tainted
> -----------------------------
> net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c:1880 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage!
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
> 1 lock held by ncat/23333:
> #0: ffffffff906030c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: netlbl_sock_setattr+0x25/0x1b0
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 11 PID: 23333 Comm: ncat Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2+ #637
> Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-6027R-72RF/X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF, BIOS 3.0 07/26/2013
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> dump_stack_lvl+0xa9/0xc0
> lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x117/0x190
> cipso_v4_sock_setattr+0x1ab/0x1b0
> netlbl_sock_setattr+0x13e/0x1b0
> selinux_netlbl_socket_post_create+0x3f/0x80
> selinux_socket_post_create+0x1a0/0x460
> security_socket_post_create+0x42/0x60
> __sock_create+0x342/0x3a0
> __sys_socket_create.part.22+0x42/0x70
> __sys_socket+0x37/0xb0
> __x64_sys_socket+0x16/0x20
> do_syscall_64+0x96/0x180
> ? do_user_addr_fault+0x68d/0xa30
> ? exc_page_fault+0x171/0x280
> ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x71/0x79
> RIP: 0033:0x7fbc0ca3fc1b
> Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 05 f2 1b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa b8 29 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d d5 f1 1b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007fff18635208 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000029
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007fbc0ca3fc1b
> RDX: 0000000000000006 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000002
> RBP: 000055d24f80f8a0 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 0000000000000001
>
> R10: 0000000000020000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055d24f80f8a0
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000055d24f80fb88 R15: 0000000000000000
> </TASK>
>
> The current implementation of cipso_v4_sock_setattr() replaces IP options
> under the assumption that the caller holds the socket lock; however, such
> assumption is not true, nor needed, in selinux_socket_post_create() hook.
>
> Let all callers of cipso_v4_sock_setattr() specify the "socket lock held"
> condition, except selinux_socket_post_create() _ where such condition can
> safely be set as true even without holding the socket lock.
>
> v3:
> - rename variable to 'sk_locked' (thanks Paul Moore)
> - keep rcu_replace_pointer() open-coded and re-add NULL check of 'old',
> these two changes will be posted in another patch (thanks Paul Moore)
>
> v2:
> - pass lockdep_sock_is_held() through a boolean variable in the stack
> (thanks Eric Dumazet, Paul Moore, Casey Schaufler)
> - use rcu_replace_pointer() instead of rcu_dereference_protected() +
> rcu_assign_pointer()
> - remove NULL check of 'old' before kfree_rcu()
>
> Fixes: f6d8bd051c39 ("inet: add RCU protection to inet->opt")
> Reported-by: Xiumei Mu <xmu@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>
> ---
> include/net/cipso_ipv4.h | 6 ++++--
> include/net/netlabel.h | 6 ++++--
> net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c | 7 ++++---
> net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c | 9 ++++++---
> security/selinux/netlabel.c | 5 ++++-
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 3 ++-
> 6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Looks good to me, thanks Davide.
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists