netdev - RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next] ice: flower: validate control flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB501348B4C2970D26DFC48C1F961C2@PH0PR11MB5013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 05:25:19 +0000
From: "Buvaneswaran, Sujai" <sujai.buvaneswaran@...el.com>
To: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Eric Dumazet
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "David S.
 Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org"
	<intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next] ice: flower: validate control
 flags

Hi Asbjørn,

Thanks for providing more information about this patch. We were able to test this patch with 'skip_sw' parameter on ice PF interface.
It is working as expected. Error is displayed when tc rule added with control flags. 

[root@...-mariner ~]# tc filter add dev ens5f0np0 ingress protocol ip flower skip_sw ip_flags frag/firstfrag action drop
Error: ice: Unsupported match on control.flags 0x3.
We have an error talking to the kernel

Without this patch, this rule is getting installed in the HW.

Regards,
Sujai B

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
> Sent: Friday, May 3, 2024 11:38 PM
> To: Buvaneswaran, Sujai <sujai.buvaneswaran@...el.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Eric Dumazet
> <edumazet@...gle.com>; Nguyen, Anthony L
> <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Paolo
> Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>; David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>;
> intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next] ice: flower: validate control
> flags
> 
> Hi Sujai,
> 
> On 5/3/24 5:57 AM, Buvaneswaran, Sujai wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@...osl.org> On Behalf
> >> Of Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 8:14 PM
> >> To: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
> >> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Eric
> >> Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>; Nguyen, Anthony L
> >> <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>; Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
> >> <ast@...erby.net>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Paolo Abeni
> >> <pabeni@...hat.com>; David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> >> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next] ice: flower: validate
> >> control flags
> >>
> >> This driver currently doesn't support any control flags.
> >>
> >> Use flow_rule_has_control_flags() to check for control flags, such as
> >> can be set through `tc flower ... ip_flags frag`.
> >>
> >> In case any control flags are masked, flow_rule_has_control_flags()
> >> sets a NL extended error message, and we return -EOPNOTSUPP.
> >>
> >> Only compile-tested.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tc_lib.c | 4 ++++
> >>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have tested this patch in upstream kernel - 6.9.0-rc5+ and observing no
> effect while adding tc flow rule with control flags.
> > 'Not supported' error is not shown while adding the below tc rule.
> >
> > [root@...-mariner ~]# tc qdisc add dev ens5f0np0 ingress
> > [root@...-mariner ~]# [root@...-mariner ~]# tc filter add dev
> > ens5f0np0 ingress protocol ip flower ip_flags frag/firstfrag action
> > drop
> 
> Thank you for testing!
> 
> I think the issue you are observing, is because you are missing "skip_sw":
> tc filter add dev ens5f0np0 ingress protocol ip flower skip_sw \
> 	ip_flags frag/firstfrag action drop
> 
> Without skip_sw, then the hardware offload is opportunistic, and therefore
> the error in hardware offloading doesn't bubble through to user space.
> 
> Without skip_sw, you should still be able to observe a change in `tc filter
> show dev ens5f0np0 ingress`. Without the patch you should see "in_hw",
> and with it you should see "not_in_hw".
> 
> With skip_sw, then the error in hardware offloading causes the tc command
> to fail, with the -EOPNOTSUPP error and associated extended Netlink error
> message.
> 
> Also see Ido's testing for mlxsw in this other thread:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZiABPNMbOOYGiHCq@shredder/#t
> 
> --
> Best regards
> Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
> Network Engineer
> Fiberby - AS42541