[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240507091424.GUZjnw8ErpQT6XJLVM@fat_crate.local>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 11:14:24 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Alexey Makhalov <alexey.makhalov@...adcom.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
hpa@...or.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
richardcochran@...il.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, zackr@...are.com,
linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com, pv-drivers@...are.com,
timothym@...are.com, akaher@...are.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, daniel@...ll.ch, airlied@...il.com,
tzimmermann@...e.de, mripard@...nel.org,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, horms@...nel.org,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/8] x86/vmware: Move common macros to vmware.h
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 02:52:58PM -0700, Alexey Makhalov wrote:
> +#define VMWARE_HYPERVISOR_PORT 0x5658
> +#define VMWARE_HYPERVISOR_PORT_HB (VMWARE_HYPERVISOR_PORT | \
> + VMWARE_HYPERVISOR_HB)
You can't help yourself not sneaking in any changes which are not code
movement, can ya?
The purpose of a sole code movement patch is to ease the review. Not to
have to look at the code movement *and* some *additional* changes which
you've done in-flight. Just because you felt like it. But which is nasty
to review.
Maybe you'll understand that better when you get to review someone
else's patch which does crap like that.
Make sure you remember that in the future, when sending patches.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists