netdev - Re: Driver and H/W APIs Workshop at netdevconf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHS8izPu9nJu-ogEZ9pJw8RzH7sxsMT9pC25widSoEQVK_d9qw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 11:17:57 -0700
From: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, 
	Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, 
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, 
	Andrew Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>, 
	"michael.chan@...adcom.com" <michael.chan@...adcom.com>, 
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, 
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, 
	Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>, 
	Shailend Chand <shailend@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Driver and H/W APIs Workshop at netdevconf

On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 6:06 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 May 2024 13:59:31 -0600 David Ahern wrote:
> > Suggested topics based on recent netdev threads include
> > - devlink - extensions, shortcomings, ...
> > - extension to memory pools
> > - new APIs for managing queues
> > - challenges of netdev / IB co-existence (e.g., driven by AI workloads)
> > - fwctl - a proposal for direct firmware access
>
> Memory pools and queue API are more of stack features.
> Please leave them out of your fwctl session.
>
> Aren't people who are actually working on those things submitting
> talks or hosting better scoped discussions? It appears you haven't
> CCed any of them..
>

Me/Willem/Pavel/David/Shailend (I know, list is long xD), submitted a
Devem TCP + Io_uring joint talk. We don't know if we'll get accepted.
So far we plan to cover netmem + memory pools out of that list. We
didn't plan to cover queue-API yet because we didn't have it accepted
at talk submission time, but we just got it accepted so I was gonna
reach out anyway to see if folks would be OK to have it in our talk.

Any objection to having queue-API discussed as part of our talk? Or
add some of us to yours? I'm fine with whatever. Just thought it fits
well as part of this Devmem TCP + io_uring talk.

-- 
Thanks,
Mina