| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CACGkMEtkH+O+cQQ_3Ar=6-tJyRurzr6ZrGf6mtWZW4VjAt4Hfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 14:24:16 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] virtio_net: enable irq for the control vq
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 12:03 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 May 2024 11:15:22 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 8:59 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Control vq polling request results consume more CPU.
> > > Especially when dim issues more control requests to the device,
> > > it's beneficial to the guest to enable control vq's irq.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > index a4d3c76654a4..79a1b30c173c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > @@ -287,6 +287,12 @@ struct virtnet_info {
> > > bool has_cvq;
> > > struct mutex cvq_lock;
> > >
> > > + /* Wait for the device to complete the request */
> > > + struct completion completion;
> > > +
> > > + /* Work struct for acquisition of cvq processing results. */
> > > + struct work_struct get_cvq;
> > > +
> > > /* Host can handle any s/g split between our header and packet data */
> > > bool any_header_sg;
> > >
> > > @@ -520,6 +526,13 @@ static bool virtqueue_napi_complete(struct napi_struct *napi,
> > > return false;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void virtnet_cvq_done(struct virtqueue *cvq)
> > > +{
> > > + struct virtnet_info *vi = cvq->vdev->priv;
> > > +
> > > + schedule_work(&vi->get_cvq);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static void skb_xmit_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > > {
> > > struct virtnet_info *vi = vq->vdev->priv;
> > > @@ -2036,6 +2049,20 @@ static bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
> > > return !oom;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void virtnet_get_cvq_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > > +{
> > > + struct virtnet_info *vi =
> > > + container_of(work, struct virtnet_info, get_cvq);
> > > + unsigned int tmp;
> > > + void *res;
> > > +
> > > + mutex_lock(&vi->cvq_lock);
> > > + res = virtqueue_get_buf(vi->cvq, &tmp);
> > > + if (res)
> > > + complete(&vi->completion);
> > > + mutex_unlock(&vi->cvq_lock);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static void skb_recv_done(struct virtqueue *rvq)
> > > {
> > > struct virtnet_info *vi = rvq->vdev->priv;
> > > @@ -2531,7 +2558,7 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd,
> > > struct scatterlist *out)
> > > {
> > > struct scatterlist *sgs[4], hdr, stat;
> > > - unsigned out_num = 0, tmp;
> > > + unsigned out_num = 0;
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > /* Caller should know better */
> > > @@ -2566,16 +2593,10 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd,
> > > return vi->ctrl->status == VIRTIO_NET_OK;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - /* Spin for a response, the kick causes an ioport write, trapping
> > > - * into the hypervisor, so the request should be handled immediately.
> > > - */
> > > - while (!virtqueue_get_buf(vi->cvq, &tmp) &&
> > > - !virtqueue_is_broken(vi->cvq)) {
> > > - cond_resched();
> > > - cpu_relax();
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > mutex_unlock(&vi->cvq_lock);
> > > +
> > > + wait_for_completion(&vi->completion);
> > > +
> >
> > A question here, can multiple cvq requests be submitted to the device?
> > If yes, what happens if the device completes them out of order?
>
> For user commands (such as ethtool cmds), multiple cvq requests is not allowed.
> because it holds the netlink lock when waiting for the response.
>
> For multiple dim commands and a user command allowed to be sent simultaneously
> , the corresponding command-specific information(desc_state) will be used to
> distinguish different responses.
Just to make sure we are on the same page. I meant at least we are
still use the global completion which seems to be problematic.
wait_for_completion(&vi->completion);
Thanks
>
> Thanks.
>
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > > return vi->ctrl->status == VIRTIO_NET_OK;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -4433,7 +4454,7 @@ static int virtnet_find_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> > >
> > > /* Parameters for control virtqueue, if any */
> > > if (vi->has_cvq) {
> > > - callbacks[total_vqs - 1] = NULL;
> > > + callbacks[total_vqs - 1] = virtnet_cvq_done;
> > > names[total_vqs - 1] = "control";
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -4952,6 +4973,8 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > if (vi->has_rss || vi->has_rss_hash_report)
> > > virtnet_init_default_rss(vi);
> > >
> > > + INIT_WORK(&vi->get_cvq, virtnet_get_cvq_work);
> > > + init_completion(&vi->completion);
> > > enable_rx_mode_work(vi);
> > >
> > > /* serialize netdev register + virtio_device_ready() with ndo_open() */
> > > --
> > > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
> > >
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists