[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240508101446.GC1736038@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 11:14:46 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Ravi Gunasekaran <r-gunasekaran@...com>,
Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@...tech.ru>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
Arvid Brodin <Arvid.Brodin@...n.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
"Ricardo B. Marliere" <ricardo@...liere.net>,
Casper Andersson <casper.casan@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net PATCH v2] hsr: Simplify code for announcing HSR nodes timer
setup
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 01:12:14PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Up till now the code to start HSR announce timer, which triggers sending
> supervisory frames, was assuming that hsr_netdev_notify() would be called
> at least twice for hsrX interface. This was required to have different
> values for old and current values of network device's operstate.
>
> This is problematic for a case where hsrX interface is already in the
> operational state when hsr_netdev_notify() is called, so timer is not
> configured to trigger and as a result the hsrX is not sending supervisory
> frames to HSR ring.
>
> This error has been discovered when hsr_ping.sh script was run. To be
> more specific - for the hsr1 and hsr2 the hsr_netdev_notify() was
> called at least twice with different IF_OPER_{LOWERDOWN|DOWN|UP} states
> assigned in hsr_check_carrier_and_operstate(hsr). As a result there was
> no issue with sending supervisory frames.
> However, with hsr3, the notify function was called only once with
> operstate set to IF_OPER_UP and timer responsible for triggering
> supervisory frames was not fired.
>
> The solution is to use netif_oper_up() and netif_running() helper
> functions to assess if network hsrX device is up.
> Only then, when the timer is not already pending, it is started.
> Otherwise it is deactivated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
>
> Fixes: f421436a591d ("net/hsr: Add support for the High-availability Seamless Redundancy protocol (HSRv0)")
> ---
> Changes for v2:
>
> - Add extra condition to check if the hsr network device is running
> (not only up).
>
> - Only start announce timer when it is not pending (to avoid period
> shortening/violation)
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists