netdev - Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: prevent NULL dereference in ip6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 17:25:27 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: prevent NULL dereference in ip6_output()

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 5:06 PM Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 04:18:42PM +0000, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > According to syzbot, there is a chance that ip6_dst_idev()
> > returns NULL in ip6_output(). Most places in IPv6 stack
> > deal with a NULL idev just fine, but not here.
> >
> > syzbot reported:
> >
> > general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc00000000bc: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
> > KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000005e0-0x00000000000005e7]
> > CPU: 0 PID: 9775 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00157-g6a30653b604a #0
> > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024
> >  RIP: 0010:ip6_output+0x231/0x3f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:237
> > Code: 3c 1e 00 49 89 df 74 08 4c 89 ef e8 19 58 db f7 48 8b 44 24 20 49 89 45 00 49 89 c5 48 8d 9d e0 05 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 0f b6 04 38 84 c0 4c 8b 74 24 28 0f 85 61 01 00 00 8b 1b 31 ff
> > RSP: 0018:ffffc9000927f0d8 EFLAGS: 00010202
> > RAX: 00000000000000bc RBX: 00000000000005e0 RCX: 0000000000040000
> > RDX: ffffc900131f9000 RSI: 0000000000004f47 RDI: 0000000000004f48
> > RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff8a1f0b9a R09: 1ffffffff1f51fad
> > R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff1f51fae R12: ffff8880293ec8c0
> > R13: ffff88805d7fc000 R14: 1ffff1100527d91a R15: dffffc0000000000
> > FS:  00007f135c6856c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > CR2: 0000000020000080 CR3: 0000000064096000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
> > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> > Call Trace:
> >  <TASK>
> >   NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:314 [inline]
> >   ip6_xmit+0xefe/0x17f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:358
> >   sctp_v6_xmit+0x9f2/0x13f0 net/sctp/ipv6.c:248
> >   sctp_packet_transmit+0x26ad/0x2ca0 net/sctp/output.c:653
> >   sctp_packet_singleton+0x22c/0x320 net/sctp/outqueue.c:783
> >   sctp_outq_flush_ctrl net/sctp/outqueue.c:914 [inline]
> >   sctp_outq_flush+0x6d5/0x3e20 net/sctp/outqueue.c:1212
> >   sctp_side_effects net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1198 [inline]
> >   sctp_do_sm+0x59cc/0x60c0 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1169
> >   sctp_primitive_ASSOCIATE+0x95/0xc0 net/sctp/primitive.c:73
> >   __sctp_connect+0x9cd/0xe30 net/sctp/socket.c:1234
> >   sctp_connect net/sctp/socket.c:4819 [inline]
> >   sctp_inet_connect+0x149/0x1f0 net/sctp/socket.c:4834
> >   __sys_connect_file net/socket.c:2048 [inline]
> >   __sys_connect+0x2df/0x310 net/socket.c:2065
> >   __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:2075 [inline]
> >   __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:2072 [inline]
> >   __x64_sys_connect+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:2072
> >   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
> >   do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
> >  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> >
> > Fixes: 778d80be5269 ("ipv6: Add disable_ipv6 sysctl to disable IPv6 operaion on specific interface.")
> > Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
>
> 'Closes:' tag would be nice.

I do not disclose some syzbot reports, for security reasons.

Maybe this escaped your radar, I am triaging most (unless I am OOO for
more than 6 days)
syzbot reports before deciding to make them public or not.

Have you seen a public report about this bug ?