netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] can: Add LIN bus as CAN abstraction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <215d898a0244d717467d44a8e93f186e2f282daa.camel@hexdev.de>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 20:20:51 +0200
From: Christoph Fritz <christoph.fritz@...dev.de>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>, Marc Kleine-Budde
 <mkl@...gutronix.de>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Vincent Mailhol
 <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,  Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
 Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,  Jiri
 Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>, Greg
 Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Sebastian Reichel
 <sre@...nel.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Andreas Lauser
 <andreas.lauser@...cedes-benz.com>,  Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 Pavel Pisa <pisa@....felk.cvut.cz>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,  Netdev
 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-input@...r.kernel.org,  linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] can: Add LIN bus as CAN abstraction

...
> ...
> > > > +static int lin_create_sysfs_id_files(struct net_device *ndev)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct lin_device *ldev = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > > > +	struct kobj_attribute *attr;
> > > > +	int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +	for (int id = 0; id < LIN_NUM_IDS; id++) {
> > > > +		ldev->sysfs_entries[id].ldev = ldev;
> > > > +		attr = &ldev->sysfs_entries[id].attr;
> > > > +		attr->attr.name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%02x", id);
> > > > +		if (!attr->attr.name)
> > > > +			return -ENOMEM;
> > > > +		attr->attr.mode = 0644;
> > > > +		attr->show = lin_identifier_show;
> > > > +		attr->store = lin_identifier_store;
> > > > +
> > > > +		sysfs_attr_init(&attr->attr);
> > > > +		ret = sysfs_create_file(ldev->lin_ids_kobj, &attr->attr);
> > > > +		if (ret) {
> > > > +			kfree(attr->attr.name);
> > > > +			return -ENOMEM;
> > > > +		}
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > 
> > > Can you use .dev_groups instead ?
> > 
> > I'm not sure where to attach this in this glue code here. Should I do a
> > class_register() and add the .dev_groups there?
> 
> I guess struct class would be correct direction but I'm not sure if it's 
> viable in this case. It would avoid the need for custom sysfs setup code
> if it's workable.

I just tried to find a way, but these are 64 sysfs files and declaring
them all static looks a bit odd to me. I might be missing something
here.

For v4 I would stick to the dynamic setup and fix the rollback.

Any objections?

Thanks
  -- Christoph