netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 07/24] ovpn: introduce the ovpn

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0d4fb251-c6cb-4805-b248-e9268175688c@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 15:55:28 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...nvpn.net>
Cc: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 07/24] ovpn: introduce the ovpn_peer object

> > Whether you WARN or not, any remaining item is going to be leaked. I'd
> > go with WARN (or maybe DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE) and free remaining
> > items. It should never happen but seems easy to deal with, so why not
> > handle it?

> This said, I have a question regarding DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE: it prints
> something only if CONFIG_DEBUG_NET is enabled.
> Is this the case on standard desktop/server distribution? Otherwise how are
> we going to get reports from users?

A bit tangential, but:

https://lwn.net/Articles/969923/

	Andrew