lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZjxaVEKv7bEuHJ8c@linux.bj.intel.com> Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 13:08:36 +0800 From: Tao Su <tao1.su@...ux.intel.com> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, edliaw@...gle.com, ivan.orlov0322@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, shuah@...nel.org, seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, bongsu.jeon@...sung.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, jarkko@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: Add _GNU_SOURCE definition when including kselftest_harness.h On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 07:00:03AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 8 May 2024 10:55:05 +0800 Tao Su wrote: > > Back to commit 38c957f07038, I don't see any advantage in using LINE_MAX. > > Can we use a fixed value instead of LINE_MAX? E.g., 1024, 2048. Then we > > just need to revert commit 809216233555. > > SGTM, FWIW. The print is printing a test summary line, printing more > than 1k seems rather unreasonable. Other facilities, like TH_LOG(), > should be used for displaying longer info. Thanks, do you think 1k is enough for test_name? >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists