[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zj2TUGKZvyiLnPvw@Laptop-X1>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 11:24:00 +0800
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [TEST] Flake report
On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 04:09:58PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Feels like the efforts to get rid of flaky tests have slowed down a bit,
> so I thought I'd poke people..
>
> Here's the full list:
> https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/flakes.html?min-flip=0&pw-y=0
> click on test name to get the list of runs and links to outputs.
>
> As a reminder please see these instructions for repro:
> https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa/wiki/How-to-run-netdev-selftests-CI-style
>
> I'll try to tag folks who touched the tests most recently, but please
> don't hesitate to chime in.
>
>
> net
> ---
>
> arp-ndisc-untracked-subnets-sh
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> To: Jaehee Park <jhpark1013@...il.com>
> Cc: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
>
> Times out on debug kernels, passes on non-debug.
> This is a real timeout, eats full 7200 seconds.
>
> xfrm-policy-sh
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
>
> Times out on debug kernels, passed on non-debug,
> This is a "inactivity" timeout, test doesn't print anything
> for 900 seconds so the runner kills it. We can bump the timeout
> but not printing for 15min is bad..
Got it, I will check these 2 cases.
Thanks
Hangbin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists