[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEuniiViXuYZK9fvqGbeiayX8L2cYHBw66=qZtz2h=8VsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 12:25:45 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] virtio_net: add support for Byte Queue Limits
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 10:28 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 03:31:56PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > Thu, May 09, 2024 at 02:41:39PM CEST, mst@...hat.com wrote:
> > >On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 01:46:15PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > >> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
> > >>
> > >> Add support for Byte Queue Limits (BQL).
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
> > >
> > >Can we get more detail on the benefits you observe etc?
> > >Thanks!
> >
> > More info about the BQL in general is here:
> > https://lwn.net/Articles/469652/
>
> I know about BQL in general. We discussed BQL for virtio in the past
> mostly I got the feedback from net core maintainers that it likely won't
> benefit virtio.
>
> So I'm asking, what kind of benefit do you observe?
Yes, benmark is more than welcomed.
Thanks
>
> --
> MST
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists