[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zj3425_gSqHByw-R@nanopsycho.orion>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 12:37:15 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org,
john.fastabend@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] virtio_net: add support for Byte Queue Limits
Thu, May 09, 2024 at 04:28:12PM CEST, mst@...hat.com wrote:
>On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 03:31:56PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Thu, May 09, 2024 at 02:41:39PM CEST, mst@...hat.com wrote:
>> >On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 01:46:15PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
>> >>
>> >> Add support for Byte Queue Limits (BQL).
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
>> >
>> >Can we get more detail on the benefits you observe etc?
>> >Thanks!
>>
>> More info about the BQL in general is here:
>> https://lwn.net/Articles/469652/
>
>I know about BQL in general. We discussed BQL for virtio in the past
>mostly I got the feedback from net core maintainers that it likely won't
>benefit virtio.
Do you have some link to that, or is it this thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/21384cb5-99a6-7431-1039-b356521e1bc3@redhat.com/
I don't see why virtio should be any different from other
drivers/devices that benefit from bql. HOL blocking is the same here are
everywhere.
>
>So I'm asking, what kind of benefit do you observe?
I don't have measurements at hand, will attach them to v2.
Thanks!
>
>--
>MST
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists