netdev - Re: [iwl-next v1 06/14] ice: base subfunction aux driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zj3_sxDq5R0ZsYBa@nanopsycho.orion>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 13:06:27 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	jacob.e.keller@...el.com, michal.kubiak@...el.com,
	maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, sridhar.samudrala@...el.com,
	przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, wojciech.drewek@...el.com,
	pio.raczynski@...il.com, jiri@...dia.com,
	mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com, shayd@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [iwl-next v1 06/14] ice: base subfunction aux driver

Fri, May 10, 2024 at 09:20:51AM CEST, michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 01:13:55PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Tue, May 07, 2024 at 01:45:07PM CEST, michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>> >From: Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@...el.com>
>> >
>> >Implement subfunction driver. It is probe when subfunction port is
>> >activated.
>> >
>> >VSI is already created. During the probe VSI is being configured.
>> >MAC unicast and broadcast filter is added to allow traffic to pass.
>> >
>> >Store subfunction pointer in VSI struct. The same is done for VF
>> >pointer. Make union of subfunction and VF pointer as only one of them
>> >can be set with one VSI.
>> >
>> >Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
>> >Signed-off-by: Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@...el.com>
>> >Signed-off-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
>> 
>> Perhaps it would make things clearer for reviewer to have all patches
>> related to sf auxdev/devlink/netdev at the end of the patchset, after
>> activation patch. Not sure why you want to mix it here.
>
>I need this code to use it in port representor implementation. You
>suggested in previous review to move activation at the end [1].

Yeah, I just thought that sfdev patches could be separate. Nevermind
then.

>
>[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/Zhje0mQgQTMXwICb@nanopsycho/