| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Zj4SHGvuxZWQEYuN@mev-dev>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 14:25:00 +0200
From: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jacob.e.keller@...el.com, michal.kubiak@...el.com,
maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, sridhar.samudrala@...el.com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, wojciech.drewek@...el.com,
pio.raczynski@...il.com, jiri@...dia.com,
mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com, shayd@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [iwl-next v1 03/14] ice: add basic devlink subfunctions support
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:05:33PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, May 10, 2024 at 09:13:51AM CEST, michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> >On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 01:06:52PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> Tue, May 07, 2024 at 01:45:04PM CEST, michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> >> >From: Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@...el.com>
> >> >
> >> >Implement devlink port handlers responsible for ethernet type devlink
> >> >subfunctions. Create subfunction devlink port and setup all resources
> >> >needed for a subfunction netdev to operate. Configure new VSI for each
> >> >new subfunction, initialize and configure interrupts and Tx/Rx resources.
> >> >Set correct MAC filters and create new netdev.
> >> >
> >> >For now, subfunction is limited to only one Tx/Rx queue pair.
> >> >
> >> >Only allocate new subfunction VSI with devlink port new command.
> >> >This makes sure that real resources are configured only when a new
> >> >subfunction gets activated. Allocate and free subfunction MSIX
> >>
> >> Interesting. You talk about actitation, yet you don't implement it here.
> >>
> >
> >I will rephrase it. I meant that new VSI needs to be created even before
> >any activation or configuration.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> >interrupt vectors using new API calls with pci_msix_alloc_irq_at
> >> >and pci_msix_free_irq.
> >> >
> >> >Support both automatic and manual subfunction numbers. If no subfunction
> >> >number is provided, use xa_alloc to pick a number automatically. This
> >> >will find the first free index and use that as the number. This reduces
> >> >burden on users in the simple case where a specific number is not
> >> >required. It may also be slightly faster to check that a number exists
> >> >since xarray lookup should be faster than a linear scan of the dyn_ports
> >> >xarray.
> >> >
> >> >Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>
> >> >Co-developed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> >> >Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> >> >Signed-off-by: Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@...el.com>
> >> >Signed-off-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
> >> >---
> >> > .../net/ethernet/intel/ice/devlink/devlink.c | 3 +
> >> > .../ethernet/intel/ice/devlink/devlink_port.c | 357 ++++++++++++++++++
> >> > .../ethernet/intel/ice/devlink/devlink_port.h | 33 ++
> >> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice.h | 4 +
> >> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 5 +-
> >> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.h | 2 +
> >> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 9 +-
> >> > 7 files changed, 410 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> >diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/devlink/devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/devlink/devlink.c
> >> >index 10073342e4f0..3fb3a7e828a4 100644
> >> >--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/devlink/devlink.c
> >> >+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/devlink/devlink.c
> >> >@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> >> > #include "ice.h"
> >> > #include "ice_lib.h"
> >> > #include "devlink.h"
> >> >+#include "devlink_port.h"
> >> > #include "ice_eswitch.h"
> >> > #include "ice_fw_update.h"
> >> > #include "ice_dcb_lib.h"
> >> >@@ -1277,6 +1278,8 @@ static const struct devlink_ops ice_devlink_ops = {
> >> >
> >> > .rate_leaf_parent_set = ice_devlink_set_parent,
> >> > .rate_node_parent_set = ice_devlink_set_parent,
> >> >+
> >> >+ .port_new = ice_devlink_port_new,
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> >+
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >> >+/**
> >> >+ * ice_devlink_port_fn_hw_addr_set - devlink handler for mac address set
> >> >+ * @port: pointer to devlink port
> >> >+ * @hw_addr: hw address to set
> >> >+ * @hw_addr_len: hw address length
> >> >+ * @extack: extack for reporting error messages
> >> >+ *
> >> >+ * Sets mac address for the port, verifies arguments and copies address
> >> >+ * to the subfunction structure.
> >> >+ *
> >> >+ * Return: zero on success or an error code on failure.
> >> >+ */
> >> >+static int
> >> >+ice_devlink_port_fn_hw_addr_set(struct devlink_port *port, const u8 *hw_addr,
> >> >+ int hw_addr_len,
> >> >+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> >> >+{
> >> >+ struct ice_dynamic_port *dyn_port;
> >> >+
> >> >+ dyn_port = ice_devlink_port_to_dyn(port);
> >> >+
> >> >+ if (hw_addr_len != ETH_ALEN || !is_valid_ether_addr(hw_addr)) {
> >> >+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Invalid ethernet address");
> >> >+ return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
> >> >+ }
> >> >+
> >> >+ ether_addr_copy(dyn_port->hw_addr, hw_addr);
> >>
> >> How does this work? You copy the address to the internal structure, but
> >> where you update the HW?
> >>
> >
> >When the basic MAC filter is added in HW.
>
> When is that. My point is, user can all this function at any time, and
> when he calls it, he expect it's applied right away. In case it can't be
> for example applied on activated SF, you should block the request.
>
>
Good point, I will block the request in this case. The filter is added
during VSI configuration, in this case during SF activation.
> >
> >>
> >> >+
> >> >+ return 0;
> >> >+}
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >> >
> >> >@@ -5383,6 +5389,7 @@ static void ice_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >> > ice_remove_arfs(pf);
> >> >
> >> > devl_lock(priv_to_devlink(pf));
> >> >+ ice_dealloc_all_dynamic_ports(pf);
> >> > ice_deinit_devlink(pf);
> >> >
> >> > ice_unload(pf);
> >> >@@ -6677,7 +6684,7 @@ static int ice_up_complete(struct ice_vsi *vsi)
> >> >
> >> > if (vsi->port_info &&
> >> > (vsi->port_info->phy.link_info.link_info & ICE_AQ_LINK_UP) &&
> >> >- vsi->netdev && vsi->type == ICE_VSI_PF) {
> >> >+ ((vsi->netdev && vsi->type == ICE_VSI_PF))) {
> >>
> >> I think this is some leftover, remove.
> >>
> >
> >Yeah, thanks, will remove it.
> >
> >>
> >> > ice_print_link_msg(vsi, true);
> >> > netif_tx_start_all_queues(vsi->netdev);
> >> > netif_carrier_on(vsi->netdev);
> >> >--
> >> >2.42.0
> >> >
> >> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists