[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36b0d460-1d96-89d8-db4a-76d735f7ee6b@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 17:21:36 +0300 (EEST)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Christoph Fritz <christoph.fritz@...dev.de>
cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andreas Lauser <andreas.lauser@...cedes-benz.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Pavel Pisa <pisa@....felk.cvut.cz>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/11] tty: serdev: Add method to enable break flags
On Thu, 9 May 2024, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> The recently introduced callback function receive_buf_fp() brings flags
> buffer support. To allow signaling of TTY_BREAK flags, this patch
> introduces serdev_device_set_break_detection() and an implementation for
> ttyport. This enables serdev devices to configure their underlying tty
> port to signal or ignore break conditions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Fritz <christoph.fritz@...dev.de>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serdev/core.c | 11 +++++++++++
> drivers/tty/serdev/serdev-ttyport.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/serdev.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c b/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c
> index 613cb356b918d..23a1e76cb553b 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c
> @@ -339,6 +339,17 @@ unsigned int serdev_device_set_baudrate(struct serdev_device *serdev, unsigned i
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(serdev_device_set_baudrate);
>
> +void serdev_device_set_break_detection(struct serdev_device *serdev, bool enable)
> +{
> + struct serdev_controller *ctrl = serdev->ctrl;
> +
> + if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops->set_break_detection)
> + return;
Why you need to test for !ctrl?
> + ctrl->ops->set_break_detection(ctrl, enable);
I'd use positive logic here:
if (ctrl->ops->set_break_detection)
ctrl->ops->set_break_detection(ctrl, enable);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(serdev_device_set_break_detection);
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists