netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: use upstream mtools

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240510072424.7c05850b@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 07:24:24 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan
 <shuah@...nel.org>, Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>, Benjamin Poirier
 <bpoirier@...dia.com>, Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, Ido Schimmel
 <idosch@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Joachim Wiberg <troglobit@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: use upstream mtools

On Fri, 10 May 2024 14:28:56 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Check that the deployed mtools version is 3.0 or above. Note that the
> version check breaks compatibility with my fork 

And Joachim's tree from before the tag, the PR was merged a while back
;)

> where I didn't bump the version, but I assume that won't be a problem.

Agreed, no point accumulating more bespoke checks.
I updated NIPA, next run should have tagged 3.0.

Speaking of requirement checks - I run the test on a fresh Fedora
install yesterday and it was failing with no indication of why.
Then I realized tcpdump wasn't installed :(