netdev - Re: [iwl-next v2 03/15] ice: add basic devlink subfunctions support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 13:04:23 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	jacob.e.keller@...el.com, michal.kubiak@...el.com,
	maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, sridhar.samudrala@...el.com,
	przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, wojciech.drewek@...el.com,
	pio.raczynski@...il.com, jiri@...dia.com,
	mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com, shayd@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [iwl-next v2 03/15] ice: add basic devlink subfunctions support

Mon, May 13, 2024 at 10:37:23AM CEST, michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com wrote:

[...]



>+int ice_devlink_create_sf_port(struct ice_dynamic_port *dyn_port)
>+{
>+	struct devlink_port_attrs attrs = {};
>+	struct devlink_port *devlink_port;
>+	struct devlink *devlink;
>+	struct ice_vsi *vsi;
>+	struct device *dev;
>+	struct ice_pf *pf;
>+	int err;
>+
>+	vsi = dyn_port->vsi;
>+	pf = dyn_port->pf;
>+	dev = ice_pf_to_dev(pf);
>+
>+	devlink_port = &dyn_port->devlink_port;
>+
>+	attrs.flavour = DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_PCI_SF;
>+	attrs.pci_sf.pf = pf->hw.bus.func;
>+	attrs.pci_sf.sf = dyn_port->sfnum;
>+
>+	devlink_port_attrs_set(devlink_port, &attrs);
>+	devlink = priv_to_devlink(pf);
>+
>+	err = devl_port_register_with_ops(devlink, devlink_port, vsi->idx,
>+					  &ice_devlink_port_sf_ops);
>+	if (err) {
>+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to create devlink port for Subfunction %d",
>+			vsi->idx);

Either use extack or avoid this error message entirely. Could you please
double you don't write dmesg error messages in case you have extack
available in the rest of this patchset?


>+		return err;
>+	}
>+
>+	return 0;
>+}
>+

[...]