[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <742bc68a-63a8-4f6e-b5ad-1f37a543f24f@foss.st.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 17:14:07 +0200
From: Christophe ROULLIER <christophe.roullier@...s.st.com>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre
Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Richard Cochran
<richardcochran@...il.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Liam Girdwood
<lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] net: stmmac: dwmac-stm32: clean the way to
manage wol irqwake
On 4/26/24 17:40, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 4/26/24 2:57 PM, Christophe Roullier wrote:
>> On STM32 platforms it is no longer needed to use a dedicated wakeup to
>> wake up system from CStop.
>
> This really needs more clarification.
>
> Why was the code needed before ? Maybe because it was used by some of
> the older STM32F4/F7/H7 SoCs ? Is it still needed by those SoCs ? Will
> this patch break those older SoCs ?
Yes you are right, if power mode use in STM32F4/F7/H7 SoC, issue with
this patch, I will abandon it.
>
>> This patch removes the dedicated wake up usage
>> and clean the way to register the wake up irq.
>
> [...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists