[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1715614744.0497134-3-hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 23:39:04 +0800
From: Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Brett Creeley <bcreeley@....com>,
Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Tal Gilboa <talgi@...dia.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Paul Greenwalt <paul.greenwalt@...el.com>,
Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki@...el.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
justinstitt@...gle.com,
donald.hunter@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v13 2/4] ethtool: provide customized dim profile management
On Mon, 13 May 2024 08:24:12 -0700, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 May 2024 22:52:13 +0800 Heng Qi wrote:
> > > > So I think we should declare "CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING depends on CONFIG_NET".
> > > > How do you think?
> > >
> > > Doesn't sound right, `can we instead make building lib/dim/net_dim.c
> >
> > Why? IIUC, the reason is that if CONFIG_NET is not set to Y, the net/core
> > directory will not be compiled, so the lockdep_rtnl_is_held symbol is not
> > present.
>
> Maybe I don't understand what you;re proposing.
> Show an actual diff please.
Like this:
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 291185f54ee4..fbb20d0d08c1 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1299,7 +1299,7 @@ config LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT
config PROVE_LOCKING
bool "Lock debugging: prove locking correctness"
- depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT
+ depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT && NET
select LOCKDEP
select DEBUG_SPINLOCK
select DEBUG_MUTEXES if !PREEMPT_RT
And there is:
In include/linux/rtnetlink.h:
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
extern bool lockdep_rtnl_is_held(void);
#else
static inline bool lockdep_rtnl_is_held(void)
{
return true;
}
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING */
In net/core/rtnetlink.c:
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
bool lockdep_rtnl_is_held(void)
{
return lockdep_is_held(&rtnl_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(lockdep_rtnl_is_held);
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING */
Thanks.
>
> > > dependent on CONFIG_NET? Untested but I'm thinking something like:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/dim/Makefile b/lib/dim/Makefile
> > > index c4cc4026c451..c02c306e2975 100644
> > > --- a/lib/dim/Makefile
> > > +++ b/lib/dim/Makefile
> > > @@ -4,4 +4,8 @@
> > >
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_DIMLIB) += dimlib.o
> > >
> > > -dimlib-objs := dim.o net_dim.o rdma_dim.o
> > > +dimlib-objs := dim.o rdma_dim.o
> > > +
> > > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_NET),y)
> > > +dimlib-objs += net_dim.o
> > > +endif
> >
> > 1. This is unlikely to work if the kernel is configured as[1]:
> >
> > [1] kernel configuration
> > CONFIG_NET=n, CONFIG_ETHTOOL_NETLINK=n, CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y,
> > (CONFIG_FSL_MC_DPIO=y && CONFIG_FSL_MC_BUS=y) select CONFIG_DIMLIB=y.
> >
> >
> > Then, because CONFIG_NET is not enabled, so there is no net_dim.o,
> > the following warning appears:
> >
> > ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: net_dim_get_rx_moderation
> > referenced by dpio-service.c
> > drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.o:(dpaa2_io_dim_work) in archive vmlinux.a
> >
> > ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: net_dim
> > referenced by dpio-service.c
> > drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.o:(dpaa2_io_update_net_dim) in archive vmlinux.a
>
> Simple, dpio-service should depend on NET if it wants NET_DIM
Powered by blists - more mailing lists