[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d11dacfa-5925-4040-b60b-02ab731d5f1a@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 07:07:31 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Erick Archer <erick.archer@...look.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, Bill Wendling
<morbo@...gle.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tty: rfcomm: prefer struct_size over open coded
arithmetic
On 12. 05. 24, 13:17, Erick Archer wrote:
> This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
> functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1][2].
>
> As the "dl" variable is a pointer to "struct rfcomm_dev_list_req" and
> this structure ends in a flexible array:
...
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/rfcomm.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/rfcomm.h
...
> @@ -528,12 +527,12 @@ static int rfcomm_get_dev_list(void __user *arg)
> list_for_each_entry(dev, &rfcomm_dev_list, list) {
> if (!tty_port_get(&dev->port))
> continue;
> - (di + n)->id = dev->id;
> - (di + n)->flags = dev->flags;
> - (di + n)->state = dev->dlc->state;
> - (di + n)->channel = dev->channel;
> - bacpy(&(di + n)->src, &dev->src);
> - bacpy(&(di + n)->dst, &dev->dst);
> + di[n].id = dev->id;
> + di[n].flags = dev->flags;
> + di[n].state = dev->dlc->state;
> + di[n].channel = dev->channel;
> + bacpy(&di[n].src, &dev->src);
> + bacpy(&di[n].dst, &dev->dst);
This does not relate much to "prefer struct_size over open coded
arithmetic". It should have been in a separate patch.
Other than that, LGTM.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists