[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240513144114.2ae7bf1a@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 14:41:14 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 16/17] selftests: netfilter: add packetdrill
based conntrack tests
On Mon, 13 May 2024 22:03:14 +0200 Florian Westphal wrote:
> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Hi Florian, I installed packetdrill in the morning and the test..
> > almost.. passes:
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> > # packetdrill/conntrack_synack_reuse.pkt (ipv6) packetdrill/conntrack_synack_reuse.pkt:33: error executing `conntrack -L -p tcp --dport 8080 2>/dev/null | grep -q SYN_RECV` command: non-zero status 1
>
> Grrr, my fault, I used a more ...forgiving version of conntrack tools.
>
> I bet its because of missing "-f ipv6" flag, so changing the line to
> include "-f $NFCT_IP_VERSION" like in the other files should make it
> work.
Ah, makes sense. I added a local patch to the system, it should be
applied on the next test, just to confirm.
> I intend to wait for a few months before adding more test cases to
> see how stable these tests will be wrt. changes elsewhere in the stack,
> there are a few other corner cases that would be nice to have coverage
> for.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists