netdev - Re: [PATCH net 2/2] r8169: disable interrupts also for GRO-scheduled NAPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e7e6cbde-8f66-454b-b417-64581cc3896c@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 13:17:27 +0200
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
CC: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Realtek
 linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Ken Milmore <ken.milmore@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] r8169: disable interrupts also for GRO-scheduled
 NAPI

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 13:05:55 +0200

> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 12:53 PM Alexander Lobakin
> <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>> Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 11:45:05 +0200
>>
>>> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 8:52 AM Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ken reported that RTL8125b can lock up if gro_flush_timeout has the
>>>> default value of 20000 and napi_defer_hard_irqs is set to 0.
>>>> In this scenario device interrupts aren't disabled, what seems to
>>>> trigger some silicon bug under heavy load. I was able to reproduce this
>>>> behavior on RTL8168h.
>>>> Disabling device interrupts if NAPI is scheduled from a place other than
>>>> the driver's interrupt handler is a necessity in r8169, for other
>>>> drivers it may still be a performance optimization.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 7274c4147afb ("r8169: don't try to disable interrupts if NAPI is scheduled already")
>>>> Reported-by: Ken Milmore <ken.milmore@...il.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 6 ++++--
>>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>>> index e5ea827a2..01f0ca53d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>>> @@ -4639,6 +4639,7 @@ static irqreturn_t rtl8169_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_instance)
>>>>  {
>>>>         struct rtl8169_private *tp = dev_instance;
>>>>         u32 status = rtl_get_events(tp);
>>>> +       int ret;
>>>>
>>>>         if ((status & 0xffff) == 0xffff || !(status & tp->irq_mask))
>>>>                 return IRQ_NONE;
>>>> @@ -4657,10 +4658,11 @@ static irqreturn_t rtl8169_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_instance)
>>>>                 rtl_schedule_task(tp, RTL_FLAG_TASK_RESET_PENDING);
>>>>         }
>>>>
>>>> -       if (napi_schedule_prep(&tp->napi)) {
>>>> +       ret = __napi_schedule_prep(&tp->napi);
>>>> +       if (ret >= 0)
>>>>                 rtl_irq_disable(tp);
>>>> +       if (ret > 0)
>>>>                 __napi_schedule(&tp->napi);
>>>> -       }
>>>>  out:
>>>>         rtl_ack_events(tp, status);
>>>>
>>>
>>> I do not understand this patch.
>>>
>>> __napi_schedule_prep() would only return -1 if NAPIF_STATE_DISABLE was set,
>>> but this should not happen under normal operations ?
>>
>> Without this patch, napi_schedule_prep() returns false if it's either
>> scheduled already OR it's disabled. Drivers disable interrupts only if
>> it returns true, which means they don't do that if it's already scheduled.
>> With this patch, __napi_schedule_prep() returns -1 if it's disabled and
>> 0 if it was already scheduled. Which means we can disable interrupts
>> when the result is >= 0, i.e. regardless if it was scheduled before the
>> call or within the call.
>>
>> IIUC, this addresses such situations:
>>
>> napi_schedule()         // we disabled interrupts
>> napi_poll()             // we polled < budget frames
>> napi_complete_done()    // reenable the interrupts, no repoll
>>   hrtimer_start()       // GRO flush is queued
>>     napi_schedule()
>>       napi_poll()       // GRO flush, BUT interrupts are enabled
>>
>> On r8169, this seems to cause issues. On other drivers, it seems to be
>> okay, but with this new helper, you can save some cycles.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
> 
> Rephrasing the changelog is not really helping.
> 
> Consider myself as a network maintainer, not as a casual patch reviewer.

And?

> 
> "This seems to cause issues" is rather weak.

It has "Reported-by", so it really causes issues.

> 
> I would simply revert the faulty commit, because the interrupts are
> going to be disabled no matter what.
> 
> Old logic was very simple and rock solid. A revert is a clear stable candidate.
> 
> rtl_irq_disable(tp);
> napi_schedule(&tp->napi);
> 
> If this is still broken, we might have similar issues in old/legacy drivers.

I might agree that we could just revert the mentioned commit for stable,
but for the next net-next, avoid unnecessary
scheduling/enabling/disabling interrupts makes sense, not only for
"old/legacy" drivers.
"Very simple and rock solid" is not an argument for avoiding improvements.

Thanks,
Olek