[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b2dd4c19-5846-4d67-9de9-829f0c417193@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 13:40:39 +0200
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Ken Milmore <ken.milmore@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net: add napi_schedule_prep variant with more
granular return value
On 14.05.2024 13:07, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 8:50 AM Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> For deciding whether to disable device interrupts, drivers may need the
>> information whether NAPIF_STATE_DISABLE or NAPIF_STATE_SCHED was set.
>> Therefore add a __napi_schedule_prep() which returns -1 in case
>> NAPIF_STATE_DISABLE was set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
>> ---
>
> net-next is closed.
>
This patch is a prerequisite for the other one. Therefore I don't see it
as net-next material. If it would be a standalone patch, I'd agree.
> See my feedback on the other patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists