[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZkNWsR04SdTpjWRZ@Laptop-X1>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 20:18:57 +0800
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, roopa@...dia.com,
bridge@...ts.linux.dev, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: net: bridge: increase IGMP/MLD exclude
timeout membership interval
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 10:46:15AM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_mld.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_mld.sh
> >> index e2b9ff773c6b..f84ab2e65754 100755
> >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_mld.sh
> >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_mld.sh
> >>
> >> $MZ $h1 -c 1 $MZPKT_ALLOW2 -q
> >> - sleep 3
> >> + sleep 5
> >> bridge -j -d -s mdb show dev br0 \
> >> | jq -e ".[].mdb[] | \
> >> select(.grp == \"$TEST_GROUP\" and \
> >
> > Maybe use a slow_wait to check the result?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Hangbin
>
> What would it improve? The wait is exact, we know how many seconds
> exactly so a plain sleep is enough and easier to backport if this
> is applied to -net.
I just afraid it fails on debug kernel with this exact time. If you think
the time is enough. I'm OK with it.
Thanks
Hangbin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists