netdev - Re: [PATCH v1] cgroup/rstat: add cgroup_rstat_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 12:59:52 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, lizefan.x@...edance.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
 yosryahmed@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, kernel-team@...udflare.com,
 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] cgroup/rstat: add cgroup_rstat_cpu_lock helpers and
 tracepoints


On 5/14/24 01:55, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 07:18:18AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>> Hi Tejun,
>>
>> Could we please apply this for-6.10, to avoid splitting tracepoint changes
>> over multiple kernel versions?
> Yeah, I can. Waiman, would that be okay?

I am OK with this commit as it shouldn't impose that much of a 
performance cost if the tracepoints are activated.

Cheers,
Longman