netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: lan966x: Remove ptp traps in case the ptp is not enabled.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240516064855.ne6uf3xanns4hh2o@DEN-DL-M31836.microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 08:48:55 +0200
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, <richardcochran@...il.com>, <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: lan966x: Remove ptp traps in case the ptp is
 not enabled.

The 05/15/2024 01:21, Vladimir Oltean wrote:

Hi Vladimir,

> 
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 09:35:00PM +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > Lan966x is adding ptp traps to redirect the ptp frames to the CPU such
> > that the HW will not forward these frames anywhere. The issue is that in
> > case ptp is not enabled and the timestamping source is et to
> > HWTSTAMP_SOURCE_NETDEV then these traps would not be removed on the
> > error path.
> > Fix this by removing the traps in this case as they are not needed.
> >
> > Fixes: 54e1ed69c40a ("net: lan966x: convert to ndo_hwtstamp_get() and ndo_hwtstamp_set()")
> > Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
> > index 2635ef8958c80..318676e42bb62 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
> > @@ -479,8 +479,10 @@ static int lan966x_port_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *dev,
> >               return err;
> >
> >       if (cfg->source == HWTSTAMP_SOURCE_NETDEV) {
> > -             if (!port->lan966x->ptp)
> > +             if (!port->lan966x->ptp) {
> > +                     lan966x_ptp_del_traps(port);
> >                       return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +             }
> >
> >               err = lan966x_ptp_hwtstamp_set(port, cfg, extack);
> >               if (err) {
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> 
> Alternatively, the -EOPNOTSUPP check could be moved before programming
> the traps in the first place.

Thanks for the review.
Actually I don't think this alternative will work. In case of PHY
timestamping, we would still like to add those rules regardless if
ptp is enabled on lan966x.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>

-- 
/Horatiu