netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] af_unix: Fix garbage collection of embryos carrying OOB with SCM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 18:22:50 +0900
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <mhal@...x.co>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
	<kuniyu@...zon.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] af_unix: Fix garbage collection of embryos carrying OOB with SCM_RIGHTS

From: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 10:55:53 +0200
> On 5/17/24 09:47, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > From: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
> > Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 07:59:16 +0200
> >> One question: git send-email automatically adds my Signed-off-by to your
> >> patch (patch 2/2 in this series). Should I leave it that way?
> > 
> > SOB is usually added by someone who changed the diff or merged it.
> > 
> > I think it would be better not to add it if not intended.  At least
> > on my laptop, it does not add SOB automatically.
> 
> Sure, I understand. And the problem was that I had format.signOff = true in
> .gitconfig. Fixed.
> 
> > FWIW, my command is like
> > 
> >   git send-email --annotate --cover-letter --thread --no-chain-reply-to \
> >   --subject-prefix "PATCH v1 net-next" \
> 
> maintainer-netdev.rst shows an example with a slightly different order:
> "[PATCH net-next v3]". But I guess it doesn't matter?

It seems patchwork can parse either format. ("net,vX" and "vX,net")

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/