[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240517122238.GE443576@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 13:22:38 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Hagar Hemdan <hagarhem@...zon.com>
Cc: Norbert Manthey <nmanthey@...zon.de>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: esp: cleanup esp_output_tail_tcp() in case of
unsupported ESPINTCP
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 08:03:09AM +0000, Hagar Hemdan wrote:
> xmit() functions should consume skb or return error codes in error
> paths.
> When the configuration "CONFIG_INET_ESPINTCP" is not used, the
> implementation of the function "esp_output_tail_tcp" violates this rule.
> The function frees the skb and returns the error code.
> This change removes the kfree_skb from both functions, for both
> esp4 and esp6.
>
> This should not be reachable in the current code, so this change is just
> a cleanup.
>
> This bug was discovered and resolved using Coverity Static Analysis
> Security Testing (SAST) by Synopsys, Inc.
>
> Fixes: e27cca96cd68 ("xfrm: add espintcp (RFC 8229)")
> Signed-off-by: Hagar Hemdan <hagarhem@...zon.com>
Hi Hagar,
If esp_output() may be the x->type->output callback called from esp_output()
then I agree that this seems to be a problem as it looks like a double free
may occur.
However, I believe that your proposed fix introduces will result in skb
being leaked leak in the case of esp_output_done() calling
esp_output_tail_tcp(). Perhaps a solution is for esp_output_done()
to free the skb if esp_output_tail_tcp() fails.
I did not analyse other call-chains, but I think such analysis is needed.
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists