netdev - Re: [PATCH net v3] selftests: net: local_termination: annotate the expected failures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8734qgwpnk.fsf@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 15:04:51 +0200
From: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
CC: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<shuah@...nel.org>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Petr Machata
	<petrm@...dia.com>, <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] selftests: net: local_termination: annotate the
 expected failures


Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com> writes:

> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 08:25:13AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> Vladimir said when adding this test:
>> 
>>   The bridge driver fares particularly badly [...] mainly because
>>   it does not implement IFF_UNICAST_FLT.
>> 
>> See commit 90b9566aa5cd ("selftests: forwarding: add a test for
>> local_termination.sh").
>> 
>> We don't want to hide the known gaps, but having a test which
>> always fails prevents us from catching regressions. Report
>> the cases we know may fail as XFAIL.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>

I'm still confused that the failure was shown for $rcv_if_name==bridge,
yet we are testing $h1==veth. But mechanically the code is correct.

Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>