[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zky9qU3QKziLAQDN@zeus>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 00:28:41 +0900
From: Ryosuke Yasuoka <ryasuoka@...hat.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, syoshida@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] nfc: nci: Fix handling of zero-length payload
packets in nci_rx_work()
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 11:58:47AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/05/2024 04:06, Ryosuke Yasuoka wrote:
> > When nci_rx_work() receives a zero-length payload packet, it should not
> > discard the packet and exit the loop. Instead, it should continue
> > processing subsequent packets.
> >
> > Fixes: d24b03535e5e ("nfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_dev_up and nci_ntf_packet")
> > Reported-by: Ryosuke Yasuoka <ryasuoka@...hat.com>
>
> That's not a valid tag here. Every bug we find - like hundreds of my
> commits - is reported by us...
>
> Drop the tag.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Thank you for pointing me out, Krzysztof. I didn't understand how to use
Reported-by tag correctly. Now I'm clear.
Yes, I remove the tag and send a new patch.
Very sorry for sending this patch again and again.
Ryosuke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists