netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] ax25: Fix refcount imbalance on inbound connections

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 13:56:37 -0400
From: Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars@...bit.com>
To: Naveen Mamindlapalli <naveenm@...vell.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-hams@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hams@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ax25: Fix refcount imbalance on inbound connections

On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 05:21:40PM GMT, Naveen Mamindlapalli wrote:
> > socket *newsock,
> >  	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> >  	struct sock *sk;
> >  	int err = 0;
> > +	ax25_cb *ax25;
> > +	ax25_dev *ax25_dev;
> 
> nit: Please follow reverse Christmas tree.

That is a new phrase for me; I had to look it up. Do you mean this:

        DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
        struct sock *sk;
        int err = 0;
+	      ax25_dev *ax25_dev;
+	      ax25_cb *ax25;

Or should I apply this to the entire block of variable declarations,
like this:

        struct sk_buff *skb;
        struct sock *newsk;
+       ax25_dev *ax25_dev;
        DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
        struct sock *sk;
+       ax25_cb *ax25;
        int err = 0;

Thanks,

-- 
Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars@...bit.com> | larsks @ {irc,twitter,github}
http://blog.oddbit.com/                | N1LKS