[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa07bf0e1ad60520705ea4f51f77bf3faa83aed6.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 13:11:52 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Rao Shoaib <Rao.Shoaib@...cle.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org
Cc: kuniyu@...zon.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] af_unix: Read with MSG_PEEK loops if the first
unread byte is OOB
On Thu, 2024-05-16 at 16:16 -0700, Rao Shoaib wrote:
> Read with MSG_PEEK flag loops if the first byte to read is an OOB byte.
> commit 22dd70eb2c3d ("af_unix: Don't peek OOB data without MSG_OOB.")
> addresses the loop issue but does not address the issue that no data
> beyond OOB byte can be read.
>
> > > > from socket import *
> > > > c1, c2 = socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM)
> > > > c1.send(b'a', MSG_OOB)
> 1
> > > > c1.send(b'b')
> 1
> > > > c2.recv(1, MSG_PEEK | MSG_DONTWAIT)
> b'b'
>
> > > > from socket import *
> > > > c1, c2 = socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM)
> > > > c2.setsockopt(SOL_SOCKET, SO_OOBINLINE, 1)
> > > > c1.send(b'a', MSG_OOB)
> 1
> > > > c1.send(b'b')
> 1
> > > > c2.recv(1, MSG_PEEK | MSG_DONTWAIT)
> b'a'
> > > > c2.recv(1, MSG_PEEK | MSG_DONTWAIT)
> b'a'
> > > > c2.recv(1, MSG_DONTWAIT)
> b'a'
> > > > c2.recv(1, MSG_PEEK | MSG_DONTWAIT)
> b'b'
> > > >
>
> Fixes: 314001f0bf92 ("af_unix: Add OOB support")
> Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib <Rao.Shoaib@...cle.com>
> ---
> net/unix/af_unix.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> index fa906ec5e657..6e5ef44640ea 100644
> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> @@ -2612,19 +2612,19 @@ static struct sk_buff *manage_oob(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk,
> if (skb == u->oob_skb) {
> if (copied) {
> skb = NULL;
> - } else if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_URGINLINE)) {
> - if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
> + } else if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
> + if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_URGINLINE)) {
> WRITE_ONCE(u->oob_skb, NULL);
> consume_skb(skb);
> + } else {
> + skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
> + WRITE_ONCE(u->oob_skb, NULL);
> + if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(skb_unref(skb)))
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
> }
> - } else if (flags & MSG_PEEK) {
> - skb = NULL;
> - } else {
> - skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
> - WRITE_ONCE(u->oob_skb, NULL);
> - if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(skb_unref(skb)))
> - kfree_skb(skb);
> - skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
> + } else if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_URGINLINE)) {
> + skb = skb_peek_next(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
> }
> }
> }
Does not apply cleanly anymore after commit 9841991a446c ("af_unix:
Update unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb under sk_receive_queue lock."), please
rebase, thanks!
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists