[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c0a1779713b5bdd443a8e8258c7dc66@manjaro.org>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 21:27:32 +0200
From: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
To: Gedalya <gedalya@...alya.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iproute2: color output should assume dark background
Hello,
On 2024-05-22 21:21, Gedalya wrote:
> Debian is now building iproute2 with color output on by default. This
> brings attention to the fact that iproute2 defaults to a color palette
> suitable for light backgrounds.
>
> The COLORFGBG environment variable, if present and correctly set would
> select a dark background. However COLORFGBG is neither ubiquitous nor
> standard. It wouldn't typically be present in a non-graphical vt, nor
> is it presnet in XFCE and many other desktop environments.
>
> Dark backgrounds seem to be the more common default, and it seems many
> people stick to that in actual use.
>
> The dark blue used by the ip command for IPv6 addresses is
> particularly hard to read on a dark background. It's really important
> for the ip command to provide basic usability e.g. when manually
> bringing up networking at the console in an emergency. I find that
> fiddling with extra details just to disable or improve the colors
> would be an unwelcome nuisance in such situations, but the Debian
> maintainer outright refuses to revert this change, without explanation
> or discussion.
>
> Instead the maintainer suggested I submit a patch upstream, which I
> will do. I've never contributed here before, so your patience and
> guidance would be very highly appreciated.
>
> Ref: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071582
FWIW, I'd support the change to dark background as the defult.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists